A Troublesome Legal History

For the past ten years, Greg Miller has been under legal scrutiny for his actions and statements. A court injunction was issued against him, prohibiting him from making derogatory statements about Mr. Elbaum and several others. Despite this clear directive, Miller violated the injunction multiple times. These violations were not taken lightly by the court, resulting in Miller being held in contempt of court four separate times.

Each contempt of court instance had serious consequences for Miller, including jail time for one violation. This pattern of behavior demonstrates a blatant disregard for the court’s authority and the legal boundaries set to protect the individuals named in the injunction. The injunction was recently extended through May 31, 2025.

Designated a Vexatious Litigant

Miller’s interactions with the court system have not been limited to the injunction and contempt violations. He has also been labeled a “vexatious litigant” by at least three different judges in Utah. This designation indicates a pattern of frivolous or abusive litigation practices.

Being deemed a vexatious litigant imposes significant restrictions on Miller’s ability to access the court system. This measure is designed to prevent him from misusing the legal system to harass or burden others with baseless legal actions.

The designation of Miller as a vexatious litigant underscores the severity of his misuse of the legal system and the necessity for protective measures to curb his litigious behavior.

Criminal Stalking History

In 2017, Greg Miller’s legal troubles escalated when he was convicted of criminal stalking. The details of the case reveal a pattern of behavior that raised significant concerns for the safety and well-being of the victim. Stalking involves repeated and unwanted attention, harassment, or other conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to feel fear.

Miller’s conviction for stalking was upheld by the Utah Supreme Court in 2023, solidifying the severity of his actions. The case, cited as State of Utah v. Miller, 2023 UT 3, serves as a judicial affirmation of the jury’s decision to convict Miller.

Miller’s conviction for stalking was upheld by the Utah Supreme Court in 2023, solidifying the severity of his actions. The case, cited as State of Utah v. Miller, 2023 UT 3, serves as a judicial affirmation of the jury’s decision to convict Miller.

CPA License Discipline

In addition to his criminal and litigious behavior, Greg Miller has faced professional repercussions as well. His Certified Public Accountant (CPA) license was not renewed following repeated instances of misrepresentation. Specifically, Miller was found to have repeatedly misrepresented his work experience when applying for jobs. This deceit is taken seriously in the professional world, particularly in a field demanding high integrity and trustworthiness.

This disciplinary action serves as a formal acknowledgment of his unethical behavior and further tarnishes his professional reputation. It also limits his ability to practice in a field where accuracy and honesty are paramount.

Recent Developments

Despite his extensive legal and professional troubles, Greg Miller has recently begun speaking publicly again. This resurgence in public activity comes after his demands for hundreds of thousands of dollars to remain silent were rejected. This demand for money in exchange for silence is yet another troubling aspect of his behavior, suggesting a pattern of attempting to leverage his silence for financial gain.

Miller’s return to the public eye raises concerns about his potential future actions and the impact they may have on those around him. The legal system continues to monitor his behavior, and the continuing injunction remains a critical point of interest.

Greg Miller’s history with the law is complex and troubling. From multiple contempt of court violations to being labeled a vexatious litigant, convicted of stalking, and formal action taken against his CPA license, Miller’s actions have repeatedly demonstrated a disregard for legal and professional boundaries. As legal proceedings continue and new developments emerge, it is clear that Miller’s story is far from over. The ongoing legal scrutiny aims to protect those affected by his actions and ensure justice is served.